court action. The only exception where a matter went to court involved another wine company, Oyster Bay, where the High Court upheld the Panels decision.
I think a key reason for this response from the market is the fact that the decisions are made by a panel drawn from the market. It is most important therefore that the high quality of the Panel membership is maintained. I am very pleased that this is in fact happening as evidenced by the recent appointment of three very highly qualified individuals to the Panel.
At present we have a very active takeovers market and, with the weight of money around and the interest of private equity funds, it looks as if the takeovers market will continue to be strong for some time. I have no doubt that we have been fortunate that the Code has been in place during this period. Takeovers in New Zealand now take place in an orderly way with all shareholders, including, in particular, minority shareholders, taking part in the takeover process. At a time when New Zealand has concerns about the loss of major companies to overseas buyers, it is even more important that there be a sensible regulatory framework to govern the takeovers market.
It has been a privilege to lead the Panel. It was a significant challenge to fIrst of all formulate a Takeovers Code suitable for the New Zealand market and then to undertake the administration and enforcement of that Code.
I have been fortunate to have been well supported by the very able people that have served on the Panel and by Senior Executive Kerry Morrell and the executive team. David Jones will be an able leader of the Panel. He and Alastair Lawrence, the new deputy chairman, were members of the original Panel. I believe I leave the Panel in good hands.